I’m interested in the phenomenon that is Fifty Shades of
Grey and the million inches of column space it has generated (and sales!). I’m also a little bemused. Most of my female friends tell me it is a
compelling read.
I remember way back in the 1980s when a film called
Nine and
a Half Weeks was released and a certain amount of notoriety surrounded it. I was studying for a degree at Sussex
University at the time and wrote a thesis on the issues that the film
raised and the ethics of censorship. The
film enraged many feminists who picketed outside the Duke of York’s cinema in
Brighton where the film was to be shown.
The story, reportedly true, charted the brief but intense relationship
between a young woman who allows herself to be dominated sexually by an
enigmatic businessman, and she explores her submissive tendencies to her
limits. A bit like
Story of O, which is also a favourite (although the outcome
is different). This basic idea has been
explored repeatedly in literature and isn’t new. It’s a concept that is a massive turn on for
many people – men and women.

I read Nine and a Half Weeks and enjoyed the direct,
no-nonsense and almost clinical style.
It was a short book and a quick and, for me, sexy read. I hated the film (directed by Adrian Lyne and
starring the badly cast Kim Basinger and Mickey Rourke) which was a pale shadow
of the book, ducking most of the SM aspects.
I was disappointed. Undoubtedly
there will be a Hollywood film version of Fifty Shades and it will be interesting
to see who will direct and star – and whether
or not it will be true to the book.
I’ve only got as far as Chapter 2 of Fifty Shades so I don’t
feel in a position to comment on it yet.
Watch this space....
No comments:
Post a Comment